Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Changes in Economic Hardship and Intimate Partner Violence: A Family Stress Framework

  • Jessica L. Lucero
  • , Sojung Lim
  • , Anna Maria Santiago
  • Utah State University
  • Michigan State University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

79 Scopus citations

Abstract

While recent studies underscore how financial stress and lack of tangible assets significantly increase the odds of intimate partner violence (IPV) among couples, little is known about these effects over time. Theoretically informed by family stress theory, this study examines the influence of changing subjective reports of economic hardship over time on the risk for IPV. Specifically, we test two hypotheses: (1) change in economic hardship significantly predicts IPV; and, specifically, (2) increased economic hardship or unstable economic conditions increases the risk of IPV. Using longitudinal data from the Fragile Families and Child Well-being Study, we assess the incidence of IPV for 941 women in committed relationships. Results from our logistic regression analyses suggest that after controlling for numerous demographic factors, women who never experienced economic hardship had lower odds of experiencing IPV than those who did. Further, women who experienced high levels of economic hardship over time had the highest odds of experiencing IPV. However, the effects of changing economic hardship on IPV were attenuated once maternal depression and parenting stress were controlled. Results are discussed in terms of practice and policy implications.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)395-406
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Family and Economic Issues
Volume37
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2016

Keywords

  • Child well-being
  • Economic hardship
  • Family stress
  • Fragile families
  • Intimate partner violence

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Changes in Economic Hardship and Intimate Partner Violence: A Family Stress Framework'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this