Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Centile‐based ultrasound morphometric tables

  • Wayne State University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Current ultrasound morphometric tables estimate centiles assuming normal distribution and similar variation throughout gestation. Our goal was to develop normative tables for biparietal diameter, femur length and average abdominal diameter using actual centiles. We studied the last complete ultrasound examination from 9510 singleton, live pregnancies without major malformations delivered at our hospital. Actual 5th, 10th, 50th, 90th and 95th centiles were calculated for each week and compared to estimates based on means and standard deviations. With advancing gestational age, variation in average abdominal diameter increased and variation in biparietal diameter and femur length remained stable. The largest difference between an actual and an estimated centile limit was 2 mm for biparietal diameter or femur length and 3 mm for average abdominal diameter. Differences between true and estimated centile limits were less than the intraobserver variation of the ultrasound measurements and therefore clinically unimportant.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)308-312
Number of pages5
JournalUltrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology
Volume5
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 1995

Keywords

  • average abdominal diameter
  • biometrics
  • biparietal diameter
  • femur length
  • ultrasound

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Centile‐based ultrasound morphometric tables'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this