Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Cefoperazone versus ceftriaxone monotherapy of nosocomial pneumonia

  • Richard J. Mangi
  • , Kathleen M. Peccerillo
  • , John Ryan
  • , Charles Berenson
  • , Thomas Greco
  • , George Thornton
  • , Vincent T. Andriole
  • Hospital of St. Raphael
  • Department of Veterans Affairs
  • St. Mary's Hospital
  • Waterbury Hospital
  • Yale University

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

25 Scopus citations

Abstract

Ceftriaxone and cefoperazone monotherapy was compared in a multicentered, randomized, nonblinded, prospective study of patients with nosocomial pneumonia. These antibiotics were equally effective, with an overall successful treatment rate of 48 (80%) of 60 for the cefoperazone-treated patients and 35 (70%) of 50 for the ceftriaxone-treated patients. Patients with nursing-home-acquired pneumonia had similar bacterial pathogens and an almost identical cure rate to those patients with hospital-acquired infection. There was no statistical difference in the incidence of side effects or superinfections. The development of secondary pneumonia with resistant bacteria was low, 3% with cefoperazone and 4% with ceftriaxone. When antibiotic, administrative, and laboratory costs were calculated, cefoperazone was slightly less expensive than ceftriaxone. Both cefoperazone and ceftriaxone are effective therapy for the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)441-447
Number of pages7
JournalDiagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
Volume15
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1992

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cefoperazone versus ceftriaxone monotherapy of nosocomial pneumonia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this