Abstract
Cefoperazone and ceftazidime monotherapy were compared in a randomized, prospective evaluation of patients with nosocomial pneumonia. These antibiotics were equally effective, with an overall successful treatment rate of 45 of 62 (73 percent) for cefoperazone-treated patients and 50 of 63 (79 percent) for ceftazidime-treated patients (p = 0.41). There was no difference in the incidence of side effects (including hypoprothrombinemia), superinfections, or colonization of the oropharynx with yeast, enterococcus, Staphylococcus aureus, or resistant gram-negative bacilli. When antibiotic administration, and laboratory costs are considered, cefoperazone is less expensive than ceftazidime. Both cefoperazone and ceftazidime are effective therapy for nosocomial pneumonia.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 44-48 |
| Number of pages | 5 |
| Journal | American Journal of Medicine |
| Volume | 85 |
| Issue number | 1 SUPPL. 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jul 25 1988 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Cefoperazone versus ceftazidime monotherapy of nosocomial pneumonia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver