Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Cefoperazone versus ceftazidime monotherapy of nosocomial pneumonia

  • Richard J. Mangi
  • , John Ryan
  • , Charles Berenson
  • , Thomas Greco
  • , Michael Simms
  • , George Thornton
  • , Vincent T. Andriole
  • Hospital of Saint Raphael
  • Department of Veterans Affairs
  • Waterbury Hospital
  • Yale University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

25 Scopus citations

Abstract

Cefoperazone and ceftazidime monotherapy were compared in a randomized, prospective evaluation of patients with nosocomial pneumonia. These antibiotics were equally effective, with an overall successful treatment rate of 45 of 62 (73 percent) for cefoperazone-treated patients and 50 of 63 (79 percent) for ceftazidime-treated patients (p = 0.41). There was no difference in the incidence of side effects (including hypoprothrombinemia), superinfections, or colonization of the oropharynx with yeast, enterococcus, Staphylococcus aureus, or resistant gram-negative bacilli. When antibiotic administration, and laboratory costs are considered, cefoperazone is less expensive than ceftazidime. Both cefoperazone and ceftazidime are effective therapy for nosocomial pneumonia.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)44-48
Number of pages5
JournalAmerican Journal of Medicine
Volume85
Issue number1 SUPPL. 1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 25 1988

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cefoperazone versus ceftazidime monotherapy of nosocomial pneumonia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this