Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Caves and spatial constraint: The prehistoric implications

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

The purposes of this chapter are to introduce "spatial constraint theory" to archaeology and to suggest that it is relevant to understanding prehistoric adaptations to caves and rockshelters. In the 1960s when I was first introduced to archaeology and anthropology, I read works of the Kulturkreislehre School (Kluckhohn 1936) as historical documents. Being of a mathematical bent, I was fascinated also by some of the work of Graebner (1911) and its archaeological counterparts. I sat in on a seminars by visiting professors Robert MacArthur (1984; MacArthur and Connell 1966; MacArthur and Wilson 1967) and George Gaylord Simpson (1965, 1967) at the University of Arizona in the late 1960s. I read E. C. Pielou (1969, 1977, 1991), and was greatly influenced by Peter Haggett's and Richard Chorley's articles and books on locational analysis and spatial modeling (Haggett 1965; Haggett and Chorley 1970; Chorley 1973; Chorley and Haggett 1968, 1970). The quantitative geographers and ecologists were also important in shaping my thinking about the location of both cultural and natural sites. Many years later (the spring and summer of 1996) I had a chance to spend several months with Peter Haggett at the Institute for Advanced Study in Bristol where he was the director. My interests in such topics were reawakened.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationSacred Darkness
Subtitle of host publicationA global perspective on the ritual use of caves
PublisherUniversity Press of Colorado
Pages371-383
Number of pages13
ISBN (Electronic)9781607321781
ISBN (Print)9781607321774
StatePublished - 2012

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Caves and spatial constraint: The prehistoric implications'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this