Abstract
We propose a simple mechanism named Carry-over Round Robin (CORR) for scheduling cells in asynchronous transfer mode networks. We quantify the operational complexity of CORR scheduling and show that it is comparable to that of a simple round-robin scheduler. We then show that, albeit its simplicity, CORR is very competitive with much more sophisticated and significantly more complex scheduling disciplines in terms of performance. We evaluate the performance of CORR using both analysis and simulation. We derive analytical bounds on the worst case end-to-end delay achieved by a CORR scheduler for different traffic arrival patterns. Using traffic traces from MPEG video streams, we compare the delay performance of CORR with that of Packet-by-Packet Generalized Processor Sharing (PGPS) and Stop-and-Go (SG). Our results show that, in terms of delay performance, CORR compares favorably with both PGPS and SG. We also analyze the fairness properties of CORR and show that it achieves near perfect fairness.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 779-796 |
| Number of pages | 18 |
| Journal | IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking |
| Volume | 6 |
| Issue number | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 1998 |
Keywords
- ATM
- Quality of service
- Round robin
- Scheduling
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Carry-over round Robin: A simple cell scheduling mechanism for ATM networks'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver