Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Carbohydrate moieties as vaccine candidates: Meeting summary

  • A. H. Lucas
  • , K. Rittenhouse-Olson
  • , M. Kronenberg
  • , M. A. Apicella
  • , D. Wang
  • , J. R. Schreiber
  • , C. E. Taylor
  • BACPAC Resources
  • La Jolla Institute for Allergy and Immunology
  • University of Iowa
  • Stanford University
  • Tufts-New England Medical Center
  • National Institutes of Health

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

15 Scopus citations

Abstract

In September 2007, a meeting entitled 'Carbohydrate Moieties as Vaccine Candidates' was held at the National Institutes of Health (Bethesda, MD). This meeting brought together scientists from a number of disciplines to address issues concerning carbohydrate moieties as targets for vaccines for a variety of pathogens and tumors. In addition, the meeting participants addressed fundamental topics of glycoimmunology including the recognition of glycotopes by B and T lymphocytes, the ontogeny of anti-carbohydrate immune responses, peptide mimicry, carbohydrate antigen processing pathways and adjuvants. One session reported progress in the development of new tools such as computational algorithms, glycan arrays and oligosaccharide synthesis and their application to carbohydrate vaccine research. The session titles were: (1) immune response to bacterial carbohydrate antigens; (2) immune response to glycolipids; (3) immune response to carbohydrate antigens on other microbes and on tumors; (4) novel vaccine approaches; (5) novel tools in carbohydrate vaccine research; (6) bench to bedside: carbohydrate moieties as vaccine immunopotentiators.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1121-1131
Number of pages11
JournalVaccine
Volume28
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 22 2010

Keywords

  • Adjuvant
  • Carbohydrate
  • Immunity
  • Tumor
  • Vaccine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Carbohydrate moieties as vaccine candidates: Meeting summary'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this