Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Cancer and leukemia group B 90203 (Alliance): Radical prostatectomy with or without neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy in localized, high-risk prostate cancer

  • James A. Eastham
  • , Glenn Heller
  • , Susan Halabi
  • , J. Paul Monk
  • , Himisha Beltran
  • , Martin Gleave
  • , Christopher P. Evans
  • , Steven K. Clinton
  • , Russell Z. Szmulewitz
  • , Jonathan Coleman
  • , David W. Hillman
  • , Colleen R. Watt
  • , Saby George
  • , Martin G. Sanda
  • , Olwen M. Hahn
  • , Mary Ellen Taplin
  • , J. Kellogg Parsons
  • , James L. Mohler
  • , Eric J. Small
  • , Michael J. Morris
  • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
  • Duke University
  • Ohio State University
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
  • University of British Columbia
  • University of California at Davis
  • The University of Chicago
  • Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN
  • Roswell Park Cancer Institute
  • Emory University
  • University of California at San Diego
  • University of California at San Francisco

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

114 Scopus citations

Abstract

PURPOSE Radical prostatectomy (RP) alone is often inadequate in curing men with clinically localized, high-risk prostate cancer (PC). We hypothesized that chemohormonal therapy (CHT) with androgen-deprivation therapy plus docetaxel before RP would improve biochemical progression-free survival (BPFS) over RP alone. PATIENTS AND METHODS Men with clinically localized, high-risk PC were assigned to RP alone or neoadjuvant CHT with androgen deprivation plus docetaxel (75 mg/m2 body surface area every 3 weeks for 6 cycles) and RP. The primary end point was 3-year BPFS. Biochemical failure was defined as a serum prostate-specific antigen level > 0.2 ng/mL that increased on 2 consecutive occasions that were at least 3 months apart. Secondary end points included 5-year BPFS, overall BPFS, local recurrence, metastasis-free survival (MFS), PC-specific mortality, and overall survival (OS). RESULTS In total, 788 men were randomly assigned. Median follow-up time was 6.1 years. The overall rates of grade 3 and 4 adverse events during chemotherapy were 26% and 19%, respectively. No difference was seen in 3-year BPFS between neoadjuvant CHT plus RP and RP alone (0.89 v 0.84, respectively; 95% CI for the difference, 20.01 to 0.11; P = .11). Neoadjuvant CHT was associated with improved overall BPFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.69; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.99), improved MFS (HR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.95), and improved OS (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.94) compared with RP alone. CONCLUSION The primary study end point, 3-year BPFS, was not met. Although some improvement was seen in secondary end points, any potential benefit must be weighed against toxicity. Our data do not support the routine use of neoadjuvant CHT and RP in patients with clinically localized, high-risk PC at this time.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3042-3050
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Clinical Oncology
Volume38
Issue number26
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 10 2020

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cancer and leukemia group B 90203 (Alliance): Radical prostatectomy with or without neoadjuvant chemohormonal therapy in localized, high-risk prostate cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this