Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Can standard preoperative serum laboratory tests predict bacterial presence at the time of revision shoulder arthroplasty?

  • American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Revision Arthroplasty / Periprosthetic Joint Infection (PJI) Multicenter Group
  • University of Washington
  • Kaiser Permanente
  • Baylor Scott & White Health
  • Cooper University Health Care
  • Jameson Crane Sports Medicine Institute
  • Cleveland Clinic Foundation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background: The utility and optimal threshold for serum laboratory tests taken prior to revision shoulder arthroplasty are unknown. We performed a multi-institutional study of consecutive revision shoulder arthroplasties to define the optimal thresholds of serum laboratory samples to predict bacterial presence in intraoperative cultures with and without definite periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Methods: Multicenter data were collected on 579 revision shoulder arthroplasties. Preoperative serum erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), C-reactive protein (CRP), complete blood count differentials, and ratios were reported. Analysis was stratified based on International Consensus Meeting (ICM) Definite and Non-Definite PJI and 2 different thresholds of culture positivity (≥2 or ≥3). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed, and area under the curve (AUC), optimal thresholds, and diagnostic utility for each test were calculated. Results: Eighty-three patients (14%) had Definite PJI per ICM criteria whereas 496 (86%) had Non-Definite PJI. Cutibacterium was the most common bacteria recovered in both Definite PJI and Non-Definite PJI. For Definite PJI using a threshold of ≥3 positive cultures, AUC values were 0.543 for ESR and 0.659 for CRP. Optimal thresholds based on ROC curves were 50.5 mm/h for ESR and 5.9 mg/L for CRP. Sensitivity and specificity were, respectively, 0.422 and 0.714 for ESR and 0.818 and 0.536 for CRP. For Non-Definite PJI, the AUC value was below 0.5 for ESR, indicating the test was worse than chance. AUC values for CRP were 0.533 and 0.540 using thresholds of ≥2 and ≥3 positive cultures, respectively. Optimal threshold based on ROC curves were 9.1. Discussion: This is the first large-scale, multicenter study of consecutive revision shoulder arthroplasties analyzing the utility of preoperative serum laboratory values in predicting positive intraoperative cultures. Overall diagnostic utility of these tests in predicting bacterial presence is low in the setting of both Definite and Non-Definite PJI, particularly serum ESR. In approaching patients with more obvious clinical symptoms (Definite PJI), optimal cutoff values are 50 mm/h for ESR and 10 mg/L for CRP. When approaching workup of a patient without obvious signs of infection (Non-Definite PJI), serum ESR and CRP have limited value in predicting presence of bacteria at the time of revision arthroplasty.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2026

Keywords

  • C-reactive protein
  • deep tissue cultures
  • Diagnostic Study
  • erythrocyte sedimentation rate
  • Level II
  • periprosthetic joint infection
  • Periprosthetic shoulder infection
  • revision shoulder arthroplasty
  • serum inflammatory labs

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Can standard preoperative serum laboratory tests predict bacterial presence at the time of revision shoulder arthroplasty?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this