Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Buddhist Constitutional Battlegrounds: Using the Courts to Litigate Monastic Celibacy in South Korea (1955–1970)

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Shortly after the conclusion of the Korean War in 1953, the Buddhist monastic community in South Korea was beset by an internal schism concerning celibacy that turned into a power struggle for control of the Korean sangha. Aside from the temples themselves, the secular courts were the primary battleground in this dispute over monastic marriages and celibacy. The legal case at the heart of the “purification movement” (chŏnghwa undong) offers insight into the monastic community’s attempts to navigate the legal landscape of post-war South Korea. The secular courts had no legal basis under the post-1948 Constitution for deciding whether celibacy was required in order to maintain one’s status as a Buddhist monk. The cases focussed instead on the legality of revising the Chogye Order’s own Constitution (chonghŏn), or more specifically the meeting or gathering in which these changes were authorized. This chapter looks at the intersection of Buddhism and constitutional law in Korea as revealed in these historical events.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationBuddhism and Comparative Constitutional Law
PublisherCambridge University Press
Pages325-342
Number of pages18
ISBN (Electronic)9781009286022
ISBN (Print)9781009286046
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2022

Keywords

  • Buddhism
  • Celibacy
  • Chogye
  • Constitutionalism
  • Japanese Empire
  • Korea
  • Sangha

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Buddhist Constitutional Battlegrounds: Using the Courts to Litigate Monastic Celibacy in South Korea (1955–1970)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this