Bridging the gap between cognitive systems engineering analysis, design and practice

Ann M. Bisantz; John D. Lee; Jonathan Pfautz; Catherine Burns; William C. Elm; Priyadarshini R. Pennathur

doi:10.1177/1541931213571073

Bridging the gap between cognitive systems engineering analysis, design and practice

Ann M. Bisantz
, John D. Lee
, Jonathan Pfautz
, Catherine Burns
, William C. Elm
, Priyadarshini R. Pennathur

Undergraduate Education Office

University of Wisconsin-Madison
Charles River Analytics Inc.
University of Waterloo
Resilient Cognitive Solutions
University of Iowa

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › peer-review

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Cognitive Systems Engineering principles and methods guide analysis and understanding of complex work domains. Taking the CSE analytic findings to the next step, design, is often not clearly specified in process form. Some reasons for a weakly specified and documented CSE analysis-to-design translation process are: (1) variations in work domain, making generalizations difficult; (2) the value of the analyses in relation to the scope of the study - Analyses from better funded studies create more value propositions for a client; and (3) practical resource considerations. The panelists share their insights on tackling challenges in translating results from CSE analysis into impactful and practicable designs, and offer solutions and strategies for making effective CSE recommendations for practice.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, HFES 2013
Pages	334-338
Number of pages	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213571073
State	Published - 2013
Event	57th Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting - 2013, HFES 2013 - San Diego, CA, United States Duration: Sep 30 2013 → Oct 4 2013

Publication series

Name	Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
ISSN (Print)	1071-1813

Conference

Conference	57th Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting - 2013, HFES 2013
Country/Territory	United States
City	San Diego, CA
Period	09/30/13 → 10/4/13

Access to Document

10.1177/1541931213571073

Cite this

Bisantz, A. M., Lee, J. D., Pfautz, J., Burns, C., Elm, W. C., & Pennathur, P. R. (2013). Bridging the gap between cognitive systems engineering analysis, design and practice. In Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, HFES 2013 (pp. 334-338). (Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society). https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213571073

@inproceedings{15a5de1b8c2d423593a7a0e4546c5fb5,

title = "Bridging the gap between cognitive systems engineering analysis, design and practice",

abstract = "Cognitive Systems Engineering principles and methods guide analysis and understanding of complex work domains. Taking the CSE analytic findings to the next step, design, is often not clearly specified in process form. Some reasons for a weakly specified and documented CSE analysis-to-design translation process are: (1) variations in work domain, making generalizations difficult; (2) the value of the analyses in relation to the scope of the study - Analyses from better funded studies create more value propositions for a client; and (3) practical resource considerations. The panelists share their insights on tackling challenges in translating results from CSE analysis into impactful and practicable designs, and offer solutions and strategies for making effective CSE recommendations for practice.",

author = "Bisantz, \{Ann M.\} and Lee, \{John D.\} and Jonathan Pfautz and Catherine Burns and Elm, \{William C.\} and Pennathur, \{Priyadarshini R.\}",

year = "2013",

doi = "10.1177/1541931213571073",

language = "English",

isbn = "9780945289432",

series = "Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society",

pages = "334--338",

booktitle = "Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, HFES 2013",

note = "57th Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting - 2013, HFES 2013 ; Conference date: 30-09-2013 Through 04-10-2013",

}

Bisantz, AM, Lee, JD, Pfautz, J, Burns, C, Elm, WC & Pennathur, PR 2013, Bridging the gap between cognitive systems engineering analysis, design and practice. in Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, HFES 2013. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, pp. 334-338, 57th Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting - 2013, HFES 2013, San Diego, CA, United States, 09/30/13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541931213571073

Bridging the gap between cognitive systems engineering analysis, design and practice. / Bisantz, Ann M.; Lee, John D.; Pfautz, Jonathan et al.
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, HFES 2013. 2013. p. 334-338 (Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference contribution › peer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Bridging the gap between cognitive systems engineering analysis, design and practice

AU - Bisantz, Ann M.

AU - Lee, John D.

AU - Pfautz, Jonathan

AU - Burns, Catherine

AU - Elm, William C.

AU - Pennathur, Priyadarshini R.

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Cognitive Systems Engineering principles and methods guide analysis and understanding of complex work domains. Taking the CSE analytic findings to the next step, design, is often not clearly specified in process form. Some reasons for a weakly specified and documented CSE analysis-to-design translation process are: (1) variations in work domain, making generalizations difficult; (2) the value of the analyses in relation to the scope of the study - Analyses from better funded studies create more value propositions for a client; and (3) practical resource considerations. The panelists share their insights on tackling challenges in translating results from CSE analysis into impactful and practicable designs, and offer solutions and strategies for making effective CSE recommendations for practice.

AB - Cognitive Systems Engineering principles and methods guide analysis and understanding of complex work domains. Taking the CSE analytic findings to the next step, design, is often not clearly specified in process form. Some reasons for a weakly specified and documented CSE analysis-to-design translation process are: (1) variations in work domain, making generalizations difficult; (2) the value of the analyses in relation to the scope of the study - Analyses from better funded studies create more value propositions for a client; and (3) practical resource considerations. The panelists share their insights on tackling challenges in translating results from CSE analysis into impactful and practicable designs, and offer solutions and strategies for making effective CSE recommendations for practice.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84889864224

U2 - 10.1177/1541931213571073

DO - 10.1177/1541931213571073

M3 - Conference contribution

AN - SCOPUS:84889864224

SN - 9780945289432

T3 - Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society

SP - 334

EP - 338

BT - Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, HFES 2013

T2 - 57th Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting - 2013, HFES 2013

Y2 - 30 September 2013 through 4 October 2013

ER -

Bridging the gap between cognitive systems engineering analysis, design and practice

Abstract

Publication series

Conference

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this