Abstract
In this comment, I discuss the target articles written by Nichols (2006/this issue) and Rogers, Sewell, Harrison, and Jordan (2006/this issue) regarding the Restructured Clinical (RC) Scales (Tellegen et al., 2003) of the MMPI-2 (Butcher, Dahlstrom, Graham, Tellegen, & Kaemmer, 1989). Both articles provide thoughtful discussion of the extent to which the RC Scales achieved the primary goals set forth by Tellegen et al., but they set different tones and come to somewhat different conclusions. I argue that the initial studies conducted on the RC Scales suggest a promising future for them. However, further studies are needed to explore the construct validity of the scales, assess their incremental validity with respect to other more established MMPI-2 scale sets, and determine their interpretive meaning in clinical contexts.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 211-216 |
| Number of pages | 6 |
| Journal | Journal of Personality Assessment |
| Volume | 87 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Oct 2006 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Bridging the divide: Comments on the restructured clinical scales of the MMPI-2'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver