Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Bleak present, bright future: II. Combined effects of episodic future thinking and scarcity on delay discounting in adults at risk for type 2 diabetes

  • VTC
  • Carilion Roanoke Memorial Hospital

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

36 Scopus citations

Abstract

The present study sought to determine if episodic future thinking (EFT) can decrease delay discounting (DD) and demand for fast food under simulations of economic scarcity in adults at risk for diabetes (i.e., overweight/obese and with hemoglobin A1c values in, or approaching, the prediabetic range). Across two sessions, participants completed assessments of DD and food demand at baseline and while prompted to: (1) engage in either EFT or control episodic recent thinking, and (2) while reading a brief narrative describing either economic scarcity or neutral income conditions. Results showed that EFT significantly reduced DD, whereas the economic scarcity narrative significantly increased DD; no significant interaction between EFT and scarcity was observed. No significant effect of either EFT or scarcity was observed on food demand. We conclude that EFT decreases DD even when challenged by simulated economic scarcity in adults at risk for diabetes. The absence of a significant interaction between EFT and scarcity suggests that these variables operate independently to influence DD in opposing directions. Effects of EFT and economic scarcity on food demand require further study. The present study was registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03664726).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)222-230
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Behavioral Medicine
Volume44
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2021

Keywords

  • Delay discounting
  • Episodic future thinking
  • Income shock
  • Obesity
  • Prediabetes
  • Scarcity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Bleak present, bright future: II. Combined effects of episodic future thinking and scarcity on delay discounting in adults at risk for type 2 diabetes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this