Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Birth outcomes in women who have taken leflunomide during pregnancy

  • Christina D. Chambers
  • , Diana L. Johnson
  • , Luther K. Robinson
  • , Stephen R. Braddock
  • , Ronghui Xu
  • , Janina Lopez-Jimenez
  • , Nicole Mirrasoul
  • , Elizabeth Salas
  • , Yunjun J. Luo
  • , Shelia Jin
  • , Kenneth Lyons Jones
  • , D. Quinn
  • , S. Riordan
  • , K. Kao
  • , J. Brochu
  • , S. LaVigne
  • , E. Conover
  • , M. Roth
  • , R. Miller
  • , B. Debus
  • L. Wolfe, J. Carey, J. Robertson, N. Djokanovic, A. Einarson, G. Koren, G. Briggs, J. Polifka, S. Lamm, O. Soldin, A. Berard, C. Lyons Gaffaney, K. Wisner
  • University of California at San Diego
  • Rady Children's Hospital
  • University of Virginia
  • University of Arizona
  • University of Connecticut
  • University of Nebraska Medical Center
  • Ferre Institute
  • University of Rochester
  • University of North Texas
  • Utah Department of Health
  • University of Toronto
  • Long Beach Memorial Medical Center
  • University of Washington
  • Georgetown University
  • University of Montreal
  • University of California at Irvine
  • University of Pittsburgh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

177 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective. In preclinical reproductive studies, leflunomide was found to be embryotoxic and teratogenic. Women treated with leflunomide are advised to avoid pregnancy; those who become pregnant are advised to reduce fetal exposure through a cholestyramine drug elimination procedure. The present study was undertaken to investigate pregnancy outcomes in women who received leflunomide and were treated with cholestyramine during pregnancy. Methods. Sixty-four pregnant women with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who were treated with leflunomide during pregnancy (95.3% of whom received cholestyramine), 108 pregnant women with RA not treated with leflunomide, and 78 healthy pregnant women were enrolled in a prospective cohort study between 1999 and 2009. Information was collected via interview of the mothers, review of medical records, and specialized physical examination of infants. Results. There were no significant differences in the overall rate of major structural defects in the exposed group (3 of 56 live births [5.4%]) relative to either comparison group (each 4.2%)(P = 0.13). The rate was similar to the 3-4% expected in the general population. There was no specific pattern of major or minor anomalies. Infants in both the leflunomide-exposed and non-leflunomide-exposed RA groups were born smaller and earlier relative to infants of healthy mothers; however, after adjustment for confounding factors, there were no significant differences between the leflunomide-exposed and non-leflunomide-exposed RA groups. Conclusion. Although the sample size is small, these data do not support the notion that there is a substantial increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes due to leflunomide exposure among women who undergo cholestyramine elimination procedure early in pregnancy. These findings can provide some reassurance to women who inadvertently become pregnant while taking leflunomide and undergo the washout procedure.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1494-1503
Number of pages10
JournalArthritis and Rheumatism
Volume62
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2010

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Birth outcomes in women who have taken leflunomide during pregnancy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this