Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Biomonitoring of exposure in farmworker studies

  • Dana B. Barr
  • , Kent Thomas
  • , Brian Curwin
  • , Doug Landsittel
  • , James Raymer
  • , Chensheng Lu
  • , K. C. Donnelly
  • , John Acquavella
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • United States Environmental Protection Agency
  • National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health
  • RTI International
  • Emory University
  • Texas A&M University
  • Monsanto Company

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

69 Scopus citations

Abstract

Although biomonitoring has been used in many occupational and environmental health and exposure studies, we are only beginning to understand the complexities and uncertainties involved with the biomonitoring process - from study design, to sample collection, to chemical analysis - and with interpreting the resulting data. We present an overview of concepts that should be considered when using biomonitoring or biomonitoring data, assess the current status of biomonitoring, and detail potential advancements in the field that may improve our ability to both collect and interpret biomonitoring data. We discuss issues such as the appropriateness of biomonitoring for a given study, the sampling time frame, temporal variability in biological measurements to nonpersistent chemicals, and the complex issues surrounding data interpretation. In addition, we provide recommendations to improve the utility of biomonitoring in farmworker studies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)936-942
Number of pages7
JournalEnvironmental Health Perspectives
Volume114
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2006

Keywords

  • Biomonitoring
  • Blood
  • Farmworker
  • Urine

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Biomonitoring of exposure in farmworker studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this