Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Biology Instructors See Value in Discussing Controversial Topics but Fear Personal and Professional Consequences

  • Abby E. Beatty
  • , Emily P. Driessen
  • , Amanda D. Clark
  • , Robin A. Costello
  • , Sharday Ewell
  • , Sheritta Fagbodun
  • , Randy L. Klabacka
  • , Todd Lamb
  • , Kimberly Mulligan
  • , Jeremiah A. Henning
  • , Cissy J. Ballen
  • Auburn University
  • Tuskegee University
  • University of South Alabama

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

24 Scopus citations

Abstract

Traditional biology curricula depict science as an objective field, overlooking the important influence that human values and biases have on what is studied and who can be a scien-tist. We can work to address this shortcoming by incorporating ideological awareness into the curriculum, which is an understanding of biases, stereotypes, and assumptions that shape contemporary and historical science. We surveyed a national sample of lower-level biology instructors to determine 1) why it is important for students to learn science, 2) the perceived educational value of ideological awareness in the classroom, and 3) hesitancies associated with ideological awareness implementation. We found that most instructors reported “understanding the world” as the main goal of science education. Despite the perceived value of ideological awareness, such as increasing student engagement and dispelling misconceptions, instructors were hesitant to implement ideological awareness modules due to potential personal and professional consequences.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberar28
JournalCell Biology Education
Volume22
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Biology Instructors See Value in Discussing Controversial Topics but Fear Personal and Professional Consequences'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this