Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Association of masking policies with mask adherence and distancing during the SARS-COV-2 pandemic

  • Eric J. Puttock
  • , Jose Marquez
  • , Deborah R. Young
  • , Abraelle M. Shirley
  • , Bing Han
  • , Thomas L. McKenzie
  • , Nicole J. Smith
  • , Kathleen Manuel
  • , Deanna Hoelscher
  • , Suzanne Spear
  • , Monica Ruiz
  • , Charlotte Smith
  • , Kimberly Krytus
  • , Iveris Martinez
  • , Hosung So
  • , Marian Levy
  • , Vikki Nolan
  • , Erika Bagley
  • , Amber Mehmood
  • , Joy Goens Thomas
  • Lily Apedaile, Shelby Ison, Daheia J. Barr-Anderson, John G. Heller, Deborah A. Cohen
  • Kaiser Permanente
  • California State University Long Beach
  • San Diego State University
  • California State University Fresno
  • University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
  • California State University Northridge
  • George Washington University
  • Berkeley Public Health
  • California State University San Bernardino
  • University of Memphis
  • Muhlenberg College
  • University of South Florida
  • Mercer University
  • University of Montana
  • University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  • University of Minnesota Twin Cities
  • University of Oklahoma

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Quantification of the impact of local masking policies may help guide future policy interventions to reduce SARS-COV-2 disease transmission. This study's objective was to identify factors associated with adherence to masking and social distancing guidelines. Methods: Faculty from 16 U.S. colleges and universities trained 231 students in systematic direct observation. They assessed correct mask use and distancing in public settings in 126 US cities from September 2020 through August 2021. Results: Of 109,999 individuals observed in 126 US cities, 48% wore masks correctly with highest adherence among females, teens and seniors and lowest among non–Hispanic whites, those in vigorous physical activity, and in larger groups (P < .0001). Having a local mask mandate increased the odds of wearing a mask by nearly 3-fold (OR = 2.99, P = .0003) compared to no recommendation. People observed in non–commercial areas were least likely to wear masks. Correct mask use was greatest in December 2020 and remained high until June 2021 (P < .0001). Masking policy requirements were not associated with distancing. Discussion: The strong association between mask mandates and correct mask use suggests that public policy has a powerful influence on individual behavior. Conclusions: Mask mandates should be considered in future pandemics to increase adherence.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)969-974
Number of pages6
JournalAmerican Journal of Infection Control
Volume50
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2022

Keywords

  • Mask mandates
  • Policy
  • Surveillance

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Association of masking policies with mask adherence and distancing during the SARS-COV-2 pandemic'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this