Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Association of fludarabine pharmacokinetic/dynamic biomarkers with donor chimerism in nonmyeloablative HCT recipients

  • Jeannine S. McCune
  • , Donald E. Mager
  • , Meagan J. Bemer
  • , Brenda M. Sandmaier
  • , Barry E. Storer
  • , Shelly Heimfeld
  • Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center
  • University of Washington

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

13 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: Fludarabine monophosphate (fludarabine) is an integral component of many reduced-intensity conditioning regimens for hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT). Fludarabine's metabolite, 9-β-D-arabinofuranosyl-2-fluoroadenine (F-ara-A), undergoes cellular uptake and activation to form the active cytotoxic metabolite fludarabine triphosphate (F-ara-ATP), which inhibits cellular DNA synthesis in CD4+ and CD8+ cells. In this study, we evaluated whether fludarabine-based pharmacologic biomarkers were associated with clinical outcomes in HCT recipients. Methods: Participants with hematologic diseases were conditioned with fludarabine and low-dose total body irradiation (TBI) followed by allogeneic HCT and post-grafting immunosuppression. After fludarabine administration, we evaluated pharmacological biomarkers for fludarabine - F-ara-A area under the curve (AUC) and the ratio of circulating CD4+ and CD8+ cells (CD4+/CD8+ ratio) after fludarabine administration - in 102 patients; F-ara-ATP accumulation rate in enriched CD4+ and CD8+ cells was evaluated in 36 and 34 patients, respectively. Results: Interpatient variability in the pharmacological biomarkers was high, ranging from 3.7-fold (F-ara-A AUC) to 39-fold (F-ara-ATP in CD8+ cells). Circulating CD8+ cells were more sensitive to fludarabine administration. A population pharmacokinetic-based sampling schedule successfully allowed for estimation of F-ara-A AUC in this outpatient population. There was a poor correlation between the F-ara-AUC and the F-ara-ATP accumulation rate in CD4+ (R 2 = 0.01) and CD8+ cells (R 2 = 0.00). No associations were seen between the four biomarkers and clinical outcomes (day +28 donor T cell chimerism, acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), neutrophil nadirs, cytomegalovirus reactivation, chronic GVHD, relapse, non-relapse mortality, or overall mortality). Conclusions: Considerable interpatient variability exists in pharmacokinetic and fludarabine-based biomarkers, but these biomarkers are not associated with clinical outcomes in fludarabine/TBI-conditioned patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)85-96
Number of pages12
JournalCancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology
Volume76
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2 2015

Keywords

  • Biomarkers
  • Fludarabine
  • Hematopoietic cell transplantation
  • Nucleoside analogs
  • Pharmacodynamics
  • Pharmacokinetics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Association of fludarabine pharmacokinetic/dynamic biomarkers with donor chimerism in nonmyeloablative HCT recipients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this