Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Association of BRAF V600E/K Mutation Status and Prior BRAF/MEK Inhibition with Pembrolizumab Outcomes in Advanced Melanoma: Pooled Analysis of 3 Clinical Trials

  • Igor Puzanov
  • , Antoni Ribas
  • , Caroline Robert
  • , Jacob Schachter
  • , Marta Nyakas
  • , Adil Daud
  • , Ana Arance
  • , Matteo S. Carlino
  • , Steven J. O'day
  • , Georgina V. Long
  • , Kim A. Margolin
  • , Reinhard Dummer
  • , Dirk Schadendorf
  • , Jose Lutzky
  • , Paolo A. Ascierto
  • , Ahmad Tarhini
  • , Jianxin Lin
  • , Robin Mogg
  • , Blanca Homet Moreno
  • , Nageatte Ibrahim
  • Omid Hamid
  • University of California at Los Angeles
  • Institut Gustave Roussy
  • Sheba Medical Center at Tel Hashomer
  • University of Oslo
  • University of California at San Francisco
  • Hospital Clinic de Barcelona
  • Blacktown Hospital
  • The University of Sydney
  • Saint John's Health Center
  • Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals
  • City of Hope National Med Center
  • University of Zurich
  • University of Duisburg-Essen
  • Mount Sinai Medical Center Miami Beach
  • IRCCS Istituto nazionale tumori Fondazione Giovanni Pascale - Napoli
  • Moffitt Cancer Center
  • Merck
  • Bill and Melinda Gates Medical Research Institute
  • The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

57 Scopus citations

Abstract

Importance: The optimal sequencing of immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy for BRAF V600E/K-mutant melanoma is not well established. Objective: To assess the association of BRAF wild-type (WT) or BRAF V600E/K-mutant status and BRAF inhibitor (BRAFi) with or without MEK inhibitor (MEKi) therapy with response to pembrolizumab. Design, Setting, and Participants: This study is a post hoc subgroup analysis of pooled data from 3 multinational, multisite studies: KEYNOTE-001 (data cutoff September 1, 2017), KEYNOTE-002 (data cutoff May 30, 2018), and KEYNOTE-006 (data cutoff December 4, 2017). Patients included in this analysis were adults with advanced melanoma and known BRAF V600E/K tumor status who had received pembrolizumab. Interventions: Patients received pembrolizumab in dosages of 2 mg/kg every 3 weeks, 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks, or 10 mg/kg every 3 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: End points were objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1, and overall survival (OS). Objective response rates, 4-year PFS, and OS rates were compared in the following patient subgroups: BRAF WT vs BRAF V600E/K-mutant melanoma and BRAF V600E/K-mutant melanoma with vs without previous treatment with BRAFi with or without MEKi therapy. Results: The overall study population (N = 1558) included 944 men (60.6%) and 614 women (39.4%). The mean (SD) age was 60.0 years (14.0). The ORR was 38.3% (596/1558), 4-year PFS rate was 22.0%, and 4-year OS rate was 36.9%. For patients with BRAF WT (n = 1124) and BRAF V600E/K-mutant melanoma (n = 434), ORR was 39.8% (n = 447) and 34.3% (n = 149), 4-year PFS rate was 22.9% and 19.8%, and 4-year OS rate was 37.5% and 35.1%, respectively. Patients with BRAF V600E/K-mutant melanoma who had (n = 271) vs had not (n = 163) previously received BRAFi with or without MEKi therapy had baseline characteristics with worse prognosis; ORR was 28.4% (n = 77) and 44.2% (n = 72), 4-year PFS rate was 15.2% and 27.8%, and 4-year OS rate was 26.9% and 49.3%, respectively. Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this subgroup analysis support the use of pembrolizumab for treatment of advanced melanoma regardless of BRAF V600E/K mutation status or receipt of prior BRAFi with or without MEKi therapy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1256-1264
Number of pages9
JournalJAMA Oncology
Volume6
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2020

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Association of BRAF V600E/K Mutation Status and Prior BRAF/MEK Inhibition with Pembrolizumab Outcomes in Advanced Melanoma: Pooled Analysis of 3 Clinical Trials'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this