Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Assessing the chronology of post-contact rock art on the northern Plains via multivariate statistical comparison with Blackfoot biographic art

  • Oregon Archaeological Society

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

Rock art can provide an important source of data on the past lives of individuals and the societies to which they belonged. However, rock art does not generally become part of the stratigraphic record, which has the unfortunate consequence that it may be decontextualized from its archaeological and/or historical context, thus limiting its potential contribution to wider anthropological debates. We introduce a method for assessing the chronology of post-contact rock art sites from the northwestern region of the North American Great Plains through multivariate statistical comparison with dated examples of Blackfoot robe (biographic) art. Our analysis of four rock art sites indicates dates that are broadly consistent with previous dating assessments, but helps sharpen their chronology, which has important consequences for these sites with regard to their position in debates relating to the post-contact era history of the region. As is the case for any chronological technique (especially indirect), the method we describe is primarily a guide that should ideally be used in conjunction with other methods, although our analyses demonstrate it can be a valuable tool nonetheless. Although the applicability of the method is illustrated here using sites on the northwestern Plains, we are confident that it could be modified for use in other areas.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)69-80
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Anthropological Archaeology
Volume45
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2017

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Assessing the chronology of post-contact rock art on the northern Plains via multivariate statistical comparison with Blackfoot biographic art'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this