Abstract
DSM-5 includes 2 competing models of borderline personality disorder (BPD) in Sections II and III. Empirical comparisons between these models are required to understand and improve intermodel continuity. We compared Section III BPD traits to Section II BPD criteria assessed via semistructured interviews in 455 current/recent psychiatric patients using correlation and regression analyses, and also evaluated the incremental predictive power of other Section III traits. In addition, we tested the hypothesis that self-harm would incrementally predict BPD Criterion 5 over the Section III traits. Results supported Section III BPD traits as an adequate representation of traditional BPD symptomatology, although modifications that would increase intermodel continuity were identified. Finally, we found support for the incremental validity of suspiciousness, anhedonia, perceptual dysregulation, and selfharm, suggesting possible gaps in the Section III PD trait definitions.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 290-296 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment |
| Volume | 9 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - May 2018 |
Keywords
- Borderline personality disorder
- Classification
- DSM-5
- DSM-IV
- Personality disorder traits
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Assessing inter-model continuity between the section II and section III conceptualizations of borderline personality disorder in DSM-5'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver