Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Assessing inter-model continuity between the section II and section III conceptualizations of borderline personality disorder in DSM-5

  • SUNY Buffalo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

26 Scopus citations

Abstract

DSM-5 includes 2 competing models of borderline personality disorder (BPD) in Sections II and III. Empirical comparisons between these models are required to understand and improve intermodel continuity. We compared Section III BPD traits to Section II BPD criteria assessed via semistructured interviews in 455 current/recent psychiatric patients using correlation and regression analyses, and also evaluated the incremental predictive power of other Section III traits. In addition, we tested the hypothesis that self-harm would incrementally predict BPD Criterion 5 over the Section III traits. Results supported Section III BPD traits as an adequate representation of traditional BPD symptomatology, although modifications that would increase intermodel continuity were identified. Finally, we found support for the incremental validity of suspiciousness, anhedonia, perceptual dysregulation, and selfharm, suggesting possible gaps in the Section III PD trait definitions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)290-296
Number of pages7
JournalPersonality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment
Volume9
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - May 2018

Keywords

  • Borderline personality disorder
  • Classification
  • DSM-5
  • DSM-IV
  • Personality disorder traits

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Assessing inter-model continuity between the section II and section III conceptualizations of borderline personality disorder in DSM-5'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this