Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Are there "his" and "hers" types of interdependence? The implications of gender differences in collective versus relational interdependence for affect, behavior, and cognition

    • Northwestern University

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    502 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    In a recent review, S. E. Cross and L. Madson (1997) forwarded that many gender differences in social experience and behavior may be better understood through consideration of gender differences in independence and interdependence. In the current studies an expansion of the model to include both relational and collective aspects of interdependence was investigated (see R. F. Baumeister & K. L. Sommer, 1997). On the basis of the literature regarding gender differences in affect, behavior, and cognition, it was hypothesized that women would focus more on the relational aspects of interdependence, whereas men would focus more on the collective aspects of interdependence. Five studies in which gender differences in self-construals, emotional experience, selective memory, and behavioral intentions were examined supported the expansion of the model to include both relational and collective aspects of interdependence.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)642-655
    Number of pages14
    JournalJournal of Personality and Social Psychology
    Volume77
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Sep 1999

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Are there "his" and "hers" types of interdependence? The implications of gender differences in collective versus relational interdependence for affect, behavior, and cognition'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this