Are Proud Tibial Cone Constructs an Effective Alternative to Those That are Fully Seated in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty?

Background: This study compared the clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcomes between patients treated with the traditional fully seated tibial cone construct and those with the novel proud tibial cone construct in revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA). Methods: This was a retrospective study of 56 adult patients who had a minimum 2-year follow-up and underwent rTKA with either the fully seated (n = 18 knees) or proud (n = 42 knees) tibial cone construct between 2010 and 2020. The electronic medical record was reviewed for demographic, clinical, and radiographic data. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (KOOS) were collected. Results: All patients had improved mechanical alignment postoperatively regardless of surgical technique. All patients showed good evidence of osseointegration without loss of fixation at the latest follow-up. There were no significant differences in the complication rate or re-revision rate between the groups. KOOS Function in Sport and Recreation (Sport/Rec) scores were significantly higher for patients treated with the fully seated construct (mean 57 [range, 20 to 95] versus 38 [range, 0 to 75], P = .04); however, no significant differences were present for the other KOOS subscales or KOOS Jr. Conclusion: The proud tibial cone construct may be an effective alternative to the fully seated construct in the setting of severe bone loss in rTKA. The proud construct avoids a proximal tibial cut, and thus is a bone-preserving technique that provides good fixation, reduces operative time, prevents potential iatrogenic injuries, decreases the need for tibial augments, saves costs, and improves the ease of restoring joint height.