Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Are Current Technical Exclusion Criteria for Clinical Trials of Magnetic Resonance–Guided High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Too Restrictive?

  • Lung W. Lau
  • , Avinash Eranki
  • , Haydar Celik
  • , Ae Rang Kim
  • , Peter C.W. Kim
  • , Karun V. Sharma
  • , Pavel S. Yarmolenko
  • Children's National Medical Center
  • Case Western Reserve University
  • National Institutes of Health

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debate

2 Scopus citations

Abstract

Certain technical criteria must be met to ensure the treatment safety of magnetic resonance–guided high-intensity focused ultrasound. We retrospectively reviewed how our enrollment criteria were applied from 2014 to 2017 in a clinical trial of magnetic resonance–guided high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation of recurrent malignant and locally aggressive benign solid tumors. Among the 36 screened patients between 2014 and 2017, more than one-third were excluded for technical exclusion criteria such as the anatomic location and proximity to prosthetics. Overall, patients were difficult to accrue for this trial, given the incidence of these tumors. To increase potential accrual, screening exclusion criteria could be more generalized and centered on the ability to achieve an acceptable treatment safety margin, rather than specifically excluding on the basis of general anatomic areas.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1849-1855
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of Ultrasound in Medicine
Volume39
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1 2020

Keywords

  • clinical trial
  • criteria
  • magnetic resonance–guided high-intensity focused ultrasound
  • tumor

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Are Current Technical Exclusion Criteria for Clinical Trials of Magnetic Resonance–Guided High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound Too Restrictive?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this