Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Antibiofilm effect of ozonized physiological saline solution on peri-implant–related biofilm

  • Caroline C. Tonon
  • , Beatriz H.D. Panariello
  • , Denise M.P. Spolidorio
  • , Ana G. Gossweiler
  • , Simone Duarte
  • Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis
  • Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

18 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Removal of dental plaque and local application of local chemical adjuncts, such as chlorhexidine (CHX), have been used to control and treat peri-implant disease. However, these methods can damage the surface properties of the implants or promote bacterial resistance. The application of ozone as an adjunctive treatment represents a new approach in the management of peri-implantitis. Thus, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the antimicrobial effect of ozonized physiological saline solution in different concentrations against oral biofilms developed on titanium surface. Methods: Single and multi-species biofilms of Porphyromonas gingivalis, Fusobacterium nucleatum, and Streptococcus oralis were formed on titanium specimens for 5 days in anaerobic conditions. Biofilms were treated with ozonized saline solution at different concentrations (25, 50, and 80 μg/NmL), for 30 seconds and 1 minute. CHX (0.12%) and saline solution (0.89% NaCl) were used as positive and negative controls, respectively. Bacterial viability was quantified by colony forming units (CFU mL−1), and biofilm images were acquired by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). Data were analyzed by parametric test (ANOVA) with Tukey post-hoc test (P < 0.05). Results: Ozonized saline solution showed antibiofilm activity at a concentration of 80 μg/NmL for 30 seconds and 1 minute, reducing, mainly, Porphyromonas gingivalis viability, with 2.78 and 1.7 log10 CFU mL−1 of reduction in both single and multi-species biofilms, respectively, when compared to the control (saline), whereas CHX reduced 1.4 and 1.2 log10 CFU mL−1. Conclusion: Ozonized saline solution has antibiofilm activity, with better effect when applied for 1 minute at 80 μg/NmL, being a promising candidate therapy for the treatment of peri-implant diseases.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1151-1162
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Periodontology
Volume92
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2021

Keywords

  • biofilm
  • Fusobacterium nucleatum
  • ozone therapy
  • peri-implantitis
  • Porphyromonas gingivalis
  • Streptococcus oralis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Antibiofilm effect of ozonized physiological saline solution on peri-implant–related biofilm'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this