TY - GEN
T1 - Analyzing the Prosodic and Lingual Features of Popular Speakers
AU - Jethra, Bhavin
AU - Golhar, Rahul
AU - Nwogu, Ifeoma
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023, Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - If the mission of Technology, Entertainment and Design (TED) is to spread ”great ideas” via talks, then high viewership of such talks is imperative to their success. But what are some stylistic differences between talks with higher viewership than others? To better understand this, we collect a large number of TED talk audio (N=2,065) from YouTube and create two categories: the lower (N1=402) and higher (N2=398) viewership classes. Using an explainable classifier (random forest), we find that prosody is not as effective a modality in predicting viewership classes, but augmenting it with linguistic features results in significantly better predictions. The prediction task is not the main objective of this work, rather it is implemented to help understand what prosodic and linguistic cues are important when differentiating between the delivery styles of low versus high viewership speakers. Although the main prosodic cues between the two classes are statistically significantly different, we found the most influential cue to be the “fraction of all words in the talk captured by LIWC”, a linguistic feature that has been shown to strongly correlate with the use of informal, nontechnical language.
AB - If the mission of Technology, Entertainment and Design (TED) is to spread ”great ideas” via talks, then high viewership of such talks is imperative to their success. But what are some stylistic differences between talks with higher viewership than others? To better understand this, we collect a large number of TED talk audio (N=2,065) from YouTube and create two categories: the lower (N1=402) and higher (N2=398) viewership classes. Using an explainable classifier (random forest), we find that prosody is not as effective a modality in predicting viewership classes, but augmenting it with linguistic features results in significantly better predictions. The prediction task is not the main objective of this work, rather it is implemented to help understand what prosodic and linguistic cues are important when differentiating between the delivery styles of low versus high viewership speakers. Although the main prosodic cues between the two classes are statistically significantly different, we found the most influential cue to be the “fraction of all words in the talk captured by LIWC”, a linguistic feature that has been shown to strongly correlate with the use of informal, nontechnical language.
KW - LIWC features
KW - Prosody
KW - TED Talks
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85171578346
U2 - 10.1007/978-3-031-37660-3_30
DO - 10.1007/978-3-031-37660-3_30
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85171578346
SN - 9783031376597
T3 - Lecture Notes in Computer Science
SP - 417
EP - 427
BT - Pattern Recognition, Computer Vision, and Image Processing. ICPR 2022 International Workshops and Challenges - Proceedings
A2 - Rousseau, Jean-Jacques
A2 - Kapralos, Bill
PB - Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH
T2 - 26th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, ICPR 2022 Workshops
Y2 - 21 August 2022 through 25 August 2022
ER -