TY - GEN
T1 - Analysis on effect of expensive soil using polumeric stabilizing agents
AU - Zhang, Xijin
AU - Yu, Xiong
AU - Guo, Yuan
AU - Fan, Xudong
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2018 MS&T18®
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Shrinkage cracking of pavement subbase layers is regarded as a major distress in the construction of pavements, especially for expansive soils. To solve the problem, polymeric soil stabilizing agents are widely used in construction engineering, because of its ability to improve the mechanical properties of soil, such as reducing shrinkage cracking and structural failure of pavement subbase layers. Additionally, bentonite usually be used as the clay specimen due to its high shrinkage potential while drying. In this research, two chemical stabilizing agents, hydrophilic and hydrophobic polyurethane were mixed with bentonite at different weight ratios, and the water content change were monitored over time. The performance of each chemical agent was also quantified by the image process. The results show when PU foam was added at a relative low weight ratio (< 5%), 3%~5% more water can be retained inside samples, and hydrophilic PU foam has a greater performance than hydrophobic PU foam at the early stage. However, there are potential problems including earlier cracking and de-polymerization of hydrophobic PU foam, when using the chemical stabilizing agents in bentonite, which are also illustrated in this paper.
AB - Shrinkage cracking of pavement subbase layers is regarded as a major distress in the construction of pavements, especially for expansive soils. To solve the problem, polymeric soil stabilizing agents are widely used in construction engineering, because of its ability to improve the mechanical properties of soil, such as reducing shrinkage cracking and structural failure of pavement subbase layers. Additionally, bentonite usually be used as the clay specimen due to its high shrinkage potential while drying. In this research, two chemical stabilizing agents, hydrophilic and hydrophobic polyurethane were mixed with bentonite at different weight ratios, and the water content change were monitored over time. The performance of each chemical agent was also quantified by the image process. The results show when PU foam was added at a relative low weight ratio (< 5%), 3%~5% more water can be retained inside samples, and hydrophilic PU foam has a greater performance than hydrophobic PU foam at the early stage. However, there are potential problems including earlier cracking and de-polymerization of hydrophobic PU foam, when using the chemical stabilizing agents in bentonite, which are also illustrated in this paper.
KW - Bentonite
KW - Hydrophilic
KW - Hydrophobic
KW - Image process
KW - Potential problems
KW - PU foam
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85060206713
U2 - 10.7449/2018/MST_2018_1549_1556
DO - 10.7449/2018/MST_2018_1549_1556
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85060206713
T3 - Materials Science and Technology 2018, MS and T 2018
SP - 1549
EP - 1556
BT - Materials Science and Technology 2018, MS and T 2018
PB - Association for Iron and Steel Technology, AISTECH
T2 - Materials Science and Technology 2018, MS and T 2018
Y2 - 14 October 2018 through 18 October 2018
ER -