Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

An in vitro comparison of the susceptibilities of bacterial isolates from patients with conjunctivitis and blepharitis to newer and established topical antibiotics

  • S. L. Everett
  • , R. P. Kowalski
  • , L. M. Karenchak
  • , D. Landsittel
  • , R. Day
  • , Y. J. Gordon
  • University of Pittsburgh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

47 Scopus citations

Abstract

This retrospective study compared new and established topical antibiotics with regard to the in vitro susceptibility of bacterial isolates recovered from patients with con junctivitis (n = 385) and blepharitis (n = 173) using the National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards approved disk diffusion method. The percent susceptibility of recovered isolates to single antibiotic agents or combinations were ranked from greatest to least: chloramphenicol, bacitracin/polymyxin B, ofloxacin, sulfa, ciprofloxacin, trimethoprim/polymyxin B, norfloxacin, gentamicin, bacitracin, trimethoprim, tobramycin, neomycin, erythromycin, and polymyxin B. We determined that none of the available topical antibiotics provided 100% broad spectrum coverage in vitro. Established antibiotics often provided coverage comparable to the newer drugs. Due to the unproven value of in vitro testing as a predictor of clinical outcome in bacterial blepharitis and conjunctivitis, the ophthalmologist should choose therapy based on clinical experience, ongoing critical evaluation of available antibiotics, and cost-effectiveness.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)382-387
Number of pages6
JournalCornea
Volume14
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - 1995

Keywords

  • Antibiotic
  • Antibiotic susceptibility
  • Blepharitis
  • Conjunctivitis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An in vitro comparison of the susceptibilities of bacterial isolates from patients with conjunctivitis and blepharitis to newer and established topical antibiotics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this