Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

An examination of whether mindfulness can predict the relationship between objective and subjective attitudinal ambivalence

  • SUNY Buffalo

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

Ambivalence is a mixed reaction toward an attitudinal object. Ambivalence is often viewed as aversive and people are motivated to reduce it. However, the presence of both strong positive and negative attitudes toward an object (objective ambivalence; OA) does not always lead to consciously experienced conflicted and torn feelings (subjective ambivalence; SA) or psychological discomfort. We hypothesized that the way people think about their inner experience can affect whether ambivalent attitudes lead to increased conflicted feelings. In five studies, we examined whether mindfulness predicts the relationship between objective and subjective ambivalence. We predicted that the acceptance aspect of mindfulness would attenuate the relationship between OA and SA, based on the idea that acceptance makes people more tolerant and less judgmental towards their inner states in general (and OA in particular). Although some findings across five studies were consistent with the prediction showing that acceptance attenuated the OA-SA relationship, other findings were not and even showed that acceptance strengthened the OA-SA relationship. A meta-analysis of the interaction effect across all studies failed to find support for predictions (r = -0.036 & 95% CI [-0.087; 0.022]). We discuss possible reasons for these mixed findings, and the implications of these studies.

Original languageEnglish
Article number854
JournalFrontiers in Psychology
Volume10
Issue numberAPR
DOIs
StatePublished - 2019

Keywords

  • Acceptance
  • Ambivalence
  • Attitudes
  • Metacognition
  • Mindfulness

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An examination of whether mindfulness can predict the relationship between objective and subjective attitudinal ambivalence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this