Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

An evaluation of stairway designs featured in architectural record between 2000 and 2012

  • SUNY Buffalo

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Scopus citations

Abstract

This paper discusses an evaluation of stairway designs featured in Architectural Record, a leading architectural professional journal, over a thirteen-year publication period (2000 to 2012). Images of stairways were classified as either hazard-free or hazard(s)-present using a hazard identification checklist, and the frequency of visible design hazards was tabulated. A total of 578 stairways were scanned in articles and advertisements, of which 78 (13.5%) were product advertisements. Sixty-one percent of the stairways had at least one visible design hazard including nearly half (47%) in product advertisements. The three most common hazards in stairways were inadequate handrails (161, 27.8%), excessive length of stairway flights (74, 12.8%), and low visual contrast on tread edges (73, 12.6%). The high prevalence of stairway design hazards in the professional literature indicates a need for improved professional education and media attention to safe stairway design.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)96-112
Number of pages17
JournalArchnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research
Volume10
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - 2016

Keywords

  • Architecture
  • Design education
  • Environmental design
  • Evaluation research
  • Hazard identification checklist
  • Stairway safety

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'An evaluation of stairway designs featured in architectural record between 2000 and 2012'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this