Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

All-Oral Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia

  • Gail J. Roboz
  • , Amer M. Zeidan
  • , Gabriel N. Mannis
  • , Pau Montesinos
  • , Montserrat Arnan
  • , Michael R. Savona
  • , Olatoyosi Odenike
  • , James K. McCloskey
  • , Harshad V. Amin
  • , Amir T. Fathi
  • , Teresa Bernal Del Castillo
  • , Gabriela Rodríguez-Macías
  • , Jane L. Liesveld
  • , Annie P. Im
  • , Jan Cerny
  • , Teresa C. Gentile
  • , Aram Oganesian
  • , Danna Chan
  • , Yubing Wan
  • , Margit Dijkstra
  • Harold N. Keer, Elizabeth A. Griffiths, Courtney D. DiNardo
  • New York Presbyterian Hospital
  • Yale University
  • Stanford University
  • Hospital Universitario La Fe
  • University of Barcelona
  • Vanderbilt University
  • The University of Chicago
  • Hackensack University Medical Center
  • Boca Raton Clinical Research
  • Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center
  • University of Oviedo
  • Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon
  • University of Rochester
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • University of Massachusetts Medical School
  • SUNY Upstate Medical University
  • Taiho Oncology Inc
  • University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Scopus citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: For patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who are 75 years of age or older or who are ineligible for intensive induction chemotherapy, azacitidine or decitabine plus venetoclax is the standard of care, but parenteral administration imposes a burden on patients and providers. Oral decitabine-cedazuridine, approved in Europe for AML, has pharmacokinetic properties equivalent to those of intravenous decitabine but provides limited survival benefit as monotherapy. METHODS: In this phase 1-2, open-label, multicenter, nonrandomized trial, we assigned patients with newly diagnosed AML who were 75 years of age or older or who were ineligible for intensive chemotherapy to receive oral decitabine-cedazuridine plus oral venetoclax. To mitigate myelosuppression observed in phase 1, schedule adjustments were encouraged in phase 2b after bone marrow blast clearance. The primary end points were the venetoclax area under the curve from 0 to 24 hours and maximum observed concentration with or without decitabine-cedazuridine (measures of drug interaction) on days 5 and 15 of cycle 2 (phase 1-2a) and complete response (phase 2a-b). RESULTS: A total of 189 patients were enrolled (30 patients in phase 1, 58 patients in phase 2a, and 101 patients in phase 2b). No drug-drug interactions were observed between decitabine-cedazuridine and venetoclax. In the pivotal phase 2b, the percentage of patients with a complete response was 47% (95% confidence interval [CI], 36 to 57), the percentage with a complete response or complete response with incomplete hematologic recovery was 63% (95% CI, 53 to 73), and median overall survival was 15.5 months (95% CI, 7.6 to could not be estimated). Common adverse events of grade 3 or higher in phase 2b were anemia (in 30% of the patients), neutropenia (in 26%), and febrile neutropenia (in 25%). Mortality was 3% at 30 days and 10% at 60 days. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with newly diagnosed AML who were ineligible for intensive chemotherapy, all-oral decitabine-cedazuridine plus venetoclax caused no drug interactions and resulted in a complete response in nearly half the patients, with myelosuppressive effects. (Funded by Taiho Oncology; ASCERTAIN-V ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04657081.).

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2107-2116
Number of pages10
JournalNew England Journal of Medicine
Volume394
Issue number21
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 4 2026

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'All-Oral Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this