Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Agreement between Fitbit and ActiGraph Estimates of Physical Activity in Young Children

  • Michael D. Schmidt
  • , Stephen L. Rathbun
  • , Zhixuan Chu
  • , Benjamin D. Boudreaux
  • , Lindsay Hahn
  • , Eric Novotny
  • , Kyle Johnsen
  • , Sun Joo Ahn
  • University of Georgia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

Physical activity (PA) estimates from the Fitbit Flex 2 were compared to those from the ActiGraph GT9X Link in 123 elementary school children. Steps and intensity-specific estimates of PA and 3-month PA change were calculated using two different ActiGraph cut-points (Evenson and Romanzini). Fitbit estimates were 35% higher for steps compared to the ActiGraph. Fitbit and ActiGraph intensity-specific estimates were closest for sedentary and light PA, while estimates of moderate and vigorous PA varied substantially depending upon the ActiGraph cut-points used. Spearman correlations between device estimates were higher for steps (rs = .70) than for moderate (rs =.54 to.55) or vigorous (rs  =.29 to.48) PA. There was low concordance between devices in assessing PA changes over time. Agreement between Fitbit Flex 2 and ActiGraph estimates may depend upon the cut-points used to classify PA intensity. However, there is fair to good agreement between devices in ranking children’s steps and MVPA.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)171-180
Number of pages10
JournalMeasurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science
Volume27
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - 2023

Keywords

  • Validity
  • change measurement
  • fitness trackers
  • steps
  • youth

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Agreement between Fitbit and ActiGraph Estimates of Physical Activity in Young Children'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this