Abstract
Physical activity (PA) estimates from the Fitbit Flex 2 were compared to those from the ActiGraph GT9X Link in 123 elementary school children. Steps and intensity-specific estimates of PA and 3-month PA change were calculated using two different ActiGraph cut-points (Evenson and Romanzini). Fitbit estimates were 35% higher for steps compared to the ActiGraph. Fitbit and ActiGraph intensity-specific estimates were closest for sedentary and light PA, while estimates of moderate and vigorous PA varied substantially depending upon the ActiGraph cut-points used. Spearman correlations between device estimates were higher for steps (rs = .70) than for moderate (rs =.54 to.55) or vigorous (rs =.29 to.48) PA. There was low concordance between devices in assessing PA changes over time. Agreement between Fitbit Flex 2 and ActiGraph estimates may depend upon the cut-points used to classify PA intensity. However, there is fair to good agreement between devices in ranking children’s steps and MVPA.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 171-180 |
| Number of pages | 10 |
| Journal | Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - 2023 |
Keywords
- Validity
- change measurement
- fitness trackers
- steps
- youth
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Agreement between Fitbit and ActiGraph Estimates of Physical Activity in Young Children'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver