Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Adjunctive intravascular lithotripsy for heavily calcified carotid stenosis: a dual-center experience and technical case series

  • Ricardo A. Hanel
  • , Vinay Jaikumar
  • , Salvador F. Gutierrez-Aguirre
  • , Hamid Sharif Khan
  • , Otavio F. De Toledo
  • , Jaims Lim
  • , Tyler A. Scullen
  • , Fernanda Rodriguez-Erazú
  • , Bernard Okai
  • , Matthew J. McPheeters
  • , Mehdi Bouslama
  • , Kunal P. Raygor
  • , Adnan H. Siddiqui
  • Baptist Neurological Institute
  • SUNY Buffalo
  • Gates Vascular Institute
  • Jacksonville University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background Heavily calcified carotid stenosis (HCCS) is considered an exclusion for carotid angioplasty and/or stenting (CAS), amenable only to carotid endarterectomy. This study presents preliminary retrospective dual-center experience utilizing the Shockwave S4 intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) system (Shockwave Medical) as an adjunct to CAS for HCCS. Methods Patients with symptomatic or asymptomatic HCCS (de novo stenosis or in-stent restenosis (ISR)) undergoing IVL+CAS were included. Charts were reviewed for demographic, imaging, procedural, and outcome data. The primary endpoint was composite major adverse event (MAE) rate: death, ipsilateral stroke, or myocardial infarction (MI) within 30 days of IVL+CAS. Secondary endpoints included technical and procedural success, residual stenosis, and ISR postprocedure. Results Fifteen patients underwent 17 IVL+CAS procedures: de novo HCCS=13, heavily calcified ISR=4; symptomatic disease was addressed in seven cases. Procedures were performed transfemorally under conscious sedation with dual protection; flow reversal through a balloon guide catheter, and distal embolic protection system (EPS) use. Median pre-IVL+CAS stenosis was 73% (IQR 60–80%). Technical success (IVL+CAS+EPS use) was achieved in all cases. Median post-IVL+CAS residual stenosis was 27% (IQR 12–33%), achieving <50% residual stenosis and procedural success in all. Five patients required dopamine infusion for postprocedural hypotension. No periprocedural ipsilateral strokes occurred. MAE rate was 6.7% (95% CI 0.2% to 32%), including one MI resulting in death. Additionally, one ISR (6.3%; 95% CI 0.2% to 30.2%) identified 160 days after IVL+CAS was retreated with angioplasty. Conclusions IVL+CAS was safe and effective for treating symptomatic and asymptomatic HCCS, achieving high rates of freedom from MAE. IVL has potential to expand the role of CAS in difficult to treat HCCS.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)54-60
Number of pages7
JournalJournal of NeuroInterventional Surgery
Volume18
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2026

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Adjunctive intravascular lithotripsy for heavily calcified carotid stenosis: a dual-center experience and technical case series'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this