TY - GEN
T1 - Adaptive techniques for intra-user variability in keystroke dynamics
AU - Çeker, Hayreddin
AU - Upadhyaya, Shambhu
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 IEEE.
PY - 2016/12/19
Y1 - 2016/12/19
N2 - Conventional machine learning algorithms based on keystroke dynamics build a classifier from labeled data in one or more sessions but assume that the dataset at the time of verification exhibits the same distribution. A user's typing characteristics may gradually change over time and space. Therefore, a traditional classifier may perform poorly on another dataset that is acquired under different environmental conditions. In this paper, we investigate the applicability of transfer learning to update a classifier according to the changing environmental conditions with minimum amount of re-training. We show that by using adaptive techniques, it is possible to identify an individual at a different time by acquiring only a few samples from another session, and at the same time obtain up to 13% higher accuracy. We make a comparative analysis among the proposed algorithms and conclude that adaptive classifiers exhibit a higher start by a good approximation and perform better than the classifier trained from start-over.
AB - Conventional machine learning algorithms based on keystroke dynamics build a classifier from labeled data in one or more sessions but assume that the dataset at the time of verification exhibits the same distribution. A user's typing characteristics may gradually change over time and space. Therefore, a traditional classifier may perform poorly on another dataset that is acquired under different environmental conditions. In this paper, we investigate the applicability of transfer learning to update a classifier according to the changing environmental conditions with minimum amount of re-training. We show that by using adaptive techniques, it is possible to identify an individual at a different time by acquiring only a few samples from another session, and at the same time obtain up to 13% higher accuracy. We make a comparative analysis among the proposed algorithms and conclude that adaptive classifiers exhibit a higher start by a good approximation and perform better than the classifier trained from start-over.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85011304369
U2 - 10.1109/BTAS.2016.7791156
DO - 10.1109/BTAS.2016.7791156
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:85011304369
T3 - 2016 IEEE 8th International Conference on Biometrics Theory, Applications and Systems, BTAS 2016
BT - 2016 IEEE 8th International Conference on Biometrics Theory, Applications and Systems, BTAS 2016
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 8th IEEE International Conference on Biometrics Theory, Applications and Systems, BTAS 2016
Y2 - 6 September 2016 through 9 September 2016
ER -