Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Thoracic Back Pain

  • Expert Panel on Neurological Imaging
  • University of California at San Francisco
  • Washington University St. Louis
  • Ohio State University
  • Albert Einstein College of Medicine
  • University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
  • Rush University Medical Center
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • University of Utah
  • University of Tennessee Health Science Center
  • Thomas Jefferson University
  • Jacobi Medical Center
  • Medical University of South Carolina
  • University of Missouri
  • University of Washington
  • Mayo Clinic Arizona
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
  • University of Iowa

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Thoracic back pain is a common site for inflammatory, neoplastic, metabolic, infectious, and degenerative conditions, and may be associated with significant disability and morbidity. Uncomplicated acute thoracic back pain and/or radiculopathy does not typically warrant imaging. Imaging may be considered in those patients who have persistent pain despite 6 weeks of conservative treatment. Early imaging may also be warranted in patients presenting with “red flag” history or symptoms, including those with a known or suspected history of cancer, infection, immunosuppression, or trauma; in myelopathic patients; or in those with a history of prior thoracic spine fusion. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision process support the systematic analysis of the medical literature from peer reviewed journals. Established methodology principles such as Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE are adapted to evaluate the evidence. The RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method User Manual provides the methodology to determine the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where peer reviewed literature is lacking or equivocal, experts may be the primary evidentiary source available to formulate a recommendation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)S504-S517
JournalJournal of the American College of Radiology
Volume21
Issue number11
DOIs
StatePublished - Nov 2024

Keywords

  • appropriate use criteria
  • Appropriateness Criteria
  • AUC
  • cancer
  • imaging
  • myelopathy
  • radiculopathy
  • spinal fusion
  • thoracic back pain

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Thoracic Back Pain'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this