Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

ACR appropriateness criteria® external-beam radiation therapy treatment planning for clinically localized prostate cancer

  • May Abdel-Wahab
  • , Omar Mahmoud
  • , Gregory Merrick
  • , I. Chow Joe Hsu
  • , V. Elayne Arterbery
  • , Jay P. Ciezki
  • , Steven J. Frank
  • , James Lloyd Mohler
  • , Brian J. Moran
  • , Seth A. Rosenthal
  • , Carl J. Rossi
  • , Yoshiya Yamada
  • Cleveland Clinic Foundation
  • University of Miami
  • Wheeling Jesuit University
  • University of California at San Francisco
  • Karmanos-Crittenton Cancer Center
  • University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
  • Chicago Prostate Cancer Center
  • Radiological Associates of Sacramento Medical Group Inc.
  • Loma Linda University Health
  • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

9 Scopus citations

Abstract

Image-based radiation treatment planning and localization have contributed to better targeting of the prostate and sparing of normal tissues. Guidelines are needed to address radiation dose delivery, including patient setup and immobilization, target volume definition, treatment planning, treatment delivery methods, and target localization. Guidelines for external-beam radiation treatment planning have been updated and are presented here. The use of appropriate doses, simulation techniques, and verification of field setup are essential for the accurate delivery of radiation therapy. The ACR Appropriateness Criteria® are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed every 2 years by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and review include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer-reviewed journals and the application of a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures by the panel. In those instances in which evidence is lacking or not definitive, expert opinion may be used to recommend imaging or treatment.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)233-238
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of the American College of Radiology
Volume9
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2012

Keywords

  • Appropriateness Criteria
  • external-beam radiation
  • prostate cancer
  • treatment planning and localization

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'ACR appropriateness criteria® external-beam radiation therapy treatment planning for clinically localized prostate cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this