Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A system justification perspective on law, human behavior, and society

  • Columbia University
  • Center for Data Science
  • New York University

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterpeer-review

Abstract

System justification theory, which posits that people are motivated to defend and legitimize existing social structures, has been used to explain a variety of social problems, including sexism, racism, classism, environmental inaction, and tolerance of corruption. In this chapter, we describe the utility of system justification theory for understanding patterns of legal judgment and decision-making, the nature of the judicial system itself, and the reasons for its relatively high levels of perceived legitimacy. We suggest that legal scholars and practitioners can benefit from attending to the ways in which system-justifying motives shape not only decisions made by judges, juries, and other legal actors, but also the social institutions in which these actors are embedded. By more deeply considering the implications of system justification processes for legal decision-making, it may be possible to identify and eliminate some barriers to progress and social justice in the legal system and society more broadly.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationResearch Handbook on Law and Psychology
PublisherEdward Elgar Publishing Ltd.
Pages83-106
Number of pages24
ISBN (Electronic)9781800881921
ISBN (Print)9781800881914
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2024

Keywords

  • Blame attributions
  • Judicial decision-making
  • Motivated reasoning
  • Political conservatism
  • System justification

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A system justification perspective on law, human behavior, and society'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this