Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A sequential density-based empirical likelihood ratio test for treatment effects

  • California State University East Bay
  • SUNY Buffalo

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

7 Scopus citations

Abstract

In health-related experiments, treatment effects can be identified using paired data that consist of pre- and posttreatment measurements. In this framework, sequential testing strategies are widely accepted statistical tools in practice. Since performances of parametric sequential testing procedures vitally depend on the validity of the parametric assumptions regarding underlying data distributions, we focus on distribution-free mechanisms for sequentially evaluating treatment effects. In fixed sample size designs, the density-based empirical likelihood (DBEL) methods provide powerful nonparametric approximations to optimal Neyman-Pearson–type statistics. In this article, we extend the DBEL methodology to develop a novel sequential DBEL testing procedure for detecting treatment effects based on paired data. The asymptotic consistency of the proposed test is shown. An extensive Monte Carlo study confirms that the proposed test outperforms the conventional sequential Wilcoxon signed-rank test across a variety of alternatives. The excellent applicability of the proposed method is exemplified using the ventilator-associated pneumonia study that evaluates the effect of Chlorhexidine Gluconate treatment in reducing oral colonization by pathogens in ventilated patients.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2115-2125
Number of pages11
JournalStatistics in Medicine
Volume38
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - May 30 2019

Keywords

  • density-based empirical likelihood
  • empirical likelihood
  • entropy
  • likelihood ratio
  • paired data
  • sequential signed-rank test
  • treatment effect
  • ventilator-associated pneumonia

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A sequential density-based empirical likelihood ratio test for treatment effects'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this