Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A practical approach to evidence-based dentistry: X How to avoid being misled by clinical studies' results in dentistry

  • Alonso Carrasco-Labra
  • , Romina Brignardello-Petersen
  • , Amir Azarpazhooh
  • , Michael Glick
  • , Gordon H. Guyatt
  • Universidad de Chile
  • University of Toronto
  • McMaster University

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

10 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background and Overview Clinicians using evidence to inform decisions on a daily basis have access to a number of tools to help them judge the importance of discriminating studies conducted using suboptimal methods from more rigorous ones. Many checklists have been developed to facilitate and guide clinicians to identify and critically appraise clinical studies. However, only limited guidance is available addressing how clinicians can identify misleading claims from those that can be supported reliably by study results. Practical Implications In this final article of a series of 10, the authors provide key concepts that clinicians can use to help them avoid using biased inferences or statements that are "too good to be true."

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)919-924
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of the American Dental Association
Volume146
Issue number12
DOIs
StatePublished - 2015

Keywords

  • Key Words Results interpretation
  • evidence-based dentistry
  • misleading presentation of results

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A practical approach to evidence-based dentistry: X How to avoid being misled by clinical studies' results in dentistry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this