Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A new divergent lineage of Daphnia (Cladocera: Anomopoda) and its morphological and genetical differentiation from Daphnia curvirostris Eylmann, 1887

  • SUNY Buffalo
  • Russian Academy of Sciences

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

55 Scopus citations

Abstract

The systematic biology of the subgenus Daphnia s.s. remains confused. Prior attempts at resolution used chiefly postabdominal claw morphology, chromosome numbers and rRNA gene sequences as characters for higher-level relations. Still, several taxa, such as Daphnia curvirostris Eylmann, 1878, have unclear affiliations. We addressed the position of D. curvirostris in this genus by estimating phylogenetic trees from a rapidly evolving protein coding gene (ND2), conducting broad geographical comparisons and carrying out detailed morphological comparisons. The Japanese 'curvirostris' was found to be a new divergent lineage in the subgenus Daphnia, and to possess distinctive morphological characteristics from D. curvirostris. We described this new species as Daphnia tanakai sp. nov., and redescribed D. curvirostris. The polymorphic postabdominal claw morphology and the distinctive chromosome number of D. tanakai sp. nov. provided evidence for rapid evolution of these traits. Our new morphological, chromosomal and genetic assessment of Daphnia weakened the argument for division of the subgenus Daphnia (Daphnia) O. F. Müller, 1785 sensu Johnson, 1952, into two further subgenera.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)385-405
Number of pages21
JournalZoological Journal of the Linnean Society
Volume146
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2006

Keywords

  • Chromosome
  • Daphnidae
  • Mitochondrial DNA
  • Morphology
  • Phylogeny
  • Postabdominal claw
  • Subgenera
  • Taxonomy

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A new divergent lineage of Daphnia (Cladocera: Anomopoda) and its morphological and genetical differentiation from Daphnia curvirostris Eylmann, 1887'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this