Abstract
Using research to develop treatment guidelines is one way to lower medical costs and improve care. However, findings from a national survey show that the public is skeptical about this approach. Specifically, the public finds arguments against establishing research-based treatment guidelines more convincing than arguments in favor of it. Our findings suggest that for evidence-based treatment guidelines to win public acceptance, the public needs to be reassured that guidelines would not lead to the limiting of access to beneficial care.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1882-1884 |
| Number of pages | 3 |
| Journal | Health Affairs |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue number | 10 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Oct 2010 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A national survey reveals public skepticism about research-based treatment guidelines'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver