Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A guide for health professionals to interpret and use recommendations in guidelines developed with the GRADE approach

  • Ignacio Neumann
  • , Nancy Santesso
  • , Elie A. Akl
  • , David M. Rind
  • , Per Olav Vandvik
  • , Pablo Alonso-Coello
  • , Thomas Agoritsas
  • , Reem A. Mustafa
  • , Paul Elias Alexander
  • , Holger Schünemann
  • , Gordon H. Guyatt
  • McMaster University
  • Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
  • American University of Beirut
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
  • UpToDate Inc.
  • Norwegian Institute of Public Health
  • Centro de Investigación Biomédicaen Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP)
  • University of Geneva
  • University of Missouri at Kansas City

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

164 Scopus citations

Abstract

An increasing number of organizations worldwide are using new and improved standards for developing trustworthy clinical guidelines. One of such approaches, developed by the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) working group, offers systematic and transparent guidance in moving from evidence to recommendations. The GRADE strategy concentrates on four factors: the balance between benefits and harms, the certainty of the evidence, values and preferences, and resource considerations. However, it also considers issues around feasibility, equity, and acceptability of recommendations. GRADE distinguishes two types of recommendations: strong and weak. Strong recommendations reflect a clear preference for one alternative and should apply to all or almost all patients, obviating the need for a careful review of the evidence with each patient. Weak recommendations are appropriate when there is a close balance between desirable and undesirable consequences of alternative management strategies, uncertainty regarding the effects of the alternatives, uncertainty or variability in patients' values and preferences, or questionable cost-effectiveness. Weak recommendations usually require accessing the underlying evidence and a shared decision-making approach. Clinicians using GRADE recommendations should understand the meaning of the strength of the recommendation, be able to critically appraise the recommendation, and apply trustworthy recommendations according to their strength.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)45-55
Number of pages11
JournalJournal of Clinical Epidemiology
Volume72
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2016

Keywords

  • Clinical practice guidelines
  • Decision making
  • Evidence-based practice
  • GRADE
  • Medical education
  • Recommendations

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A guide for health professionals to interpret and use recommendations in guidelines developed with the GRADE approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this