Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A dyadic analysis of relationships and health: Does couple-level context condition partner effects?

  • University of Georgia

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

36 Scopus citations

Abstract

Adding to the growing literature explicating the links between romantic relationships and health, this study examined how both couple-level characteristics, particularly union type (e.g., dating, cohabiting, or marriage) and interracial pairing, and interpersonal characteristics (e.g., partner strain and support), predicted young adults' physical and mental health. Using dyadic data from a sample of 249 young, primarily Black couples, we hypothesized and found support for the importance of couple-level context, partner behavior, and their interaction in predicting health. Interracial couples (all Black/non-Black pairings) reported worse health than monoracial Black couples. Union type, however, did not directly predict health but was a significant moderator of partner strain. That is, the negative association between partner strain and self-reported health was stronger for cohabiting and married couples versus their dating counterparts, suggesting that coresidence, more so than marital status, may be important for understanding partner effects on physical health. For psychological distress, however, partner support proved equally beneficial across union types.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)448-459
Number of pages12
JournalJournal of Family Psychology
Volume28
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2014

Keywords

  • Dyadic data analysis
  • Psychological distress
  • Romantic relationships
  • Self-reported health
  • Young adulthood

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A dyadic analysis of relationships and health: Does couple-level context condition partner effects?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this