Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A critical issue of using the variance of the total in the linearization method – In the context of unequal probability sampling

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

Publicly available national survey data are useful for the evidence-based research to advance our understanding of important questions in the health and biomedical sciences. Appropriate variance estimation is a crucial step to evaluate the strength of evidence in the data analysis. In survey data analysis, the conventional linearization method for estimating the variance of a statistic of interest uses the variance estimator of the total based on linearized variables. We warn that this common practice may result in undesirable consequences such as susceptibility to data shift and severely inflated variance estimates, when unequal weights are incorporated into variance estimation. We propose to use the variance estimator of the mean (mean-approach) instead of the variance estimator of the total (total-approach). We show a superiority of the mean-approach through analytical investigations. A real data example (the National Comorbidity Survey Replication) and simulation-based studies strongly support our conclusion.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1475-1483
Number of pages9
JournalStatistics in Medicine
Volume38
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 15 2019

Keywords

  • Hansen-Hurwitz estimator
  • influence function
  • NCS-R
  • NHANES
  • variance of the variance estimator

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A critical issue of using the variance of the total in the linearization method – In the context of unequal probability sampling'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this