Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A Comprehensive 4-layered In Silico Pharmacogenomics Analysis of the Genetic Addiction Risk Severity (GARS) Test: Strong Genetic Evidence Supporting GARS as a Novel Personalized Pre-addiction Assessment Tool in the Opioid Crisis Era

  • Alireza Sharafshah
  • , Kai Uwe Lewandrowski
  • , Igor Elman
  • , David Baron
  • , Panayotis K. Thanos
  • , Colin Hanna
  • , Mark S. Gold
  • , Rajendra D. Badgaiyan
  • , Jean Lud Cadet
  • , Edward J. Modestino
  • , Eric R. Braverman
  • , Catherine A. Dennen
  • , Milan Makale
  • , Keerthy Sunder
  • , Kevin T. Murphy
  • , Abdalla Bowirrat
  • , Albert Pinhasov
  • , Marjorie Gondre-Lewis
  • , Eliot Gardner
  • , Daniel Sipple
  • Nicole Jafari, Foojan Zeine, Jag Khalsa, Rossano Kepler Alvim Fiorelli, Kenneth Blum
  • Guilan University of Medical Sciences
  • Fundación Universitaria Sanitas
  • Center for Advanced Spine Care of Southern Arizona
  • Universidade Federal do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
  • Harvard University
  • Western University of Health Sciences
  • SUNY Buffalo
  • Washington University St. Louis
  • Case Western Reserve University
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Curry College
  • LLC
  • Jefferson Health Northeast
  • University of California at San Diego
  • University of California at Riverside
  • LLC
  • Ariel University
  • Midwest Brain & Spine Institute
  • California State University Long Beach
  • The Chicago School of Professional Psychology

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background: Overdose involving opioids is the black heart of the addiction crisis. “Pre-addiction,” as an encouraging concept by NIDA and NIAAA, seems best captured with the construct of dopamine dysregulation. Referring to the abundant publications on “Reward Deficiency Syndrome” (RDS), Genetic Addiction Risk Score (GARS) test, RDSQ29, and KB220, Pre-addiction can be referred to as “reward dysregulation” as a suitable suggestion. The hypothesis is that the true phenotype is RDS, and other behavioral disorders are endophenotypes where the genetic variants play important roles, specifically in the Brain Reward Cascade (BRC). Methods: This study tested the pharmacogenomics of the GARS panel by a multi-model in silico investigation in four layers: 1) Protein-Protein Interactions (PPIs); 2) Gene Regulatory Networks (GRNs); 3) Disease, drugs and chemicals (DDCs); and 4) Gene Coexpression Networks (GCNs). Results: All in silico findings were combined in an Enrichment Analysis for 59 refined genes, which represented highly significant associations of dopamine pathways in the BRC and supported our hypothesis. Conclusion: This paper provides scientific evidence for the importance of incorporating GARS as a predictive test to identify Pre-addiction, introduce unique therapeutic targets assisting in the treatment of pain, drug dosing of prescription pharmaceuticals, and identify the risk for subsequent addiction early in -life.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2153-2180
Number of pages28
JournalCurrent Pharmaceutical Biotechnology
Volume26
Issue number13
DOIs
StatePublished - 2025

Keywords

  • Genetic Addiction Risk Score (GARS)
  • Pre-addiction
  • Reward Deficiency Syndrome (RDS)
  • dopamine dysregulation
  • in silico
  • pharmacogenomics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Comprehensive 4-layered In Silico Pharmacogenomics Analysis of the Genetic Addiction Risk Severity (GARS) Test: Strong Genetic Evidence Supporting GARS as a Novel Personalized Pre-addiction Assessment Tool in the Opioid Crisis Era'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this