Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A Comparison of Narrative and Table Formats for Presenting Hypothetical Health States to Patients with Gastrointestinal or Pulmonary Disease

  • AstraZeneca
  • McMaster University
  • SUNY Buffalo

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

22 Scopus citations

Abstract

Traditionally, quality-of-life researchers describe states of health for patients to rate either in narrative form or in table form, but evidence about which format patients prefer is limited. The authors performed 2 randomized studies to test whether patients prefer the table or narrative format and whether the format of presentation influences how patients rate health states. Approximately three-fourths of patients with gastrointestinal disease or chronic airflow limitation preferred the table format. There were no differences in patients' ratings of 3 described health states or of their own health. Investigators should consider using the table presentation for describing health states to subjects who are not familiar with these states of health.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)53-60
Number of pages8
JournalMedical Decision Making
Volume24
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2004

Keywords

  • Health states
  • Health-related quality of life
  • Marker states
  • Preference ratings
  • Randomized controlled trial
  • Standard gamble
  • Utility
  • Visual analogue scale

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A Comparison of Narrative and Table Formats for Presenting Hypothetical Health States to Patients with Gastrointestinal or Pulmonary Disease'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this