Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

2009 Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for diagnosing first episodes of lower extremities deep vein thrombosis in ambulatory outpatients

  • Roman Jaeschke
  • , Piotr Gajewski
  • , Shannon M. Bates
  • , James Douketis
  • , Bogdan Solnica
  • , Mark Crowther
  • , Wiktoria Leśniak
  • , Jan L. Brozlek
  • , Holger J. Schünemann
  • , Krystyna Zawilska
  • , Witold Tomkowski
  • , Anetta Undas
  • , Jan Sznajd
  • , Rafał Nizlankowski
  • , Małgorzata M. Bała
  • , Gordon Guyatt
  • McMaster University
  • Polish Institute of Evidence Based Medicine
  • Jagiellonian University Medical College
  • Henderson Research Centre
  • University of Medical Sciences Poznan
  • National Institute of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

6 Scopus citations

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The GRADE working group has recently suggested a rigorous framework for clinical practice guidelines (CPG) addressing diagnostic tests and test strategies based on the impact of alternative approaches on patient-important outcomes. The framework mandates explicit evidence summaries, ratings of the quality of evidence, and specifying recommendations as strong or weak. OBJECTIVES: To test the feasibility and performance of the GRADE approach, we applied this framework to well-researched issues in the diagnoses of deep venous thrombosis (DVT). METHODS: After identifying pertinent clinical questions, we searched existing CPG and systematic reviews for relevant studies. We summarized the data in form of evidence tables and developed recommendations including, when needed, a formal consensus process. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: We provide three groups of recommendations for clinicians practicing in settings with access to different types of D-dimer tests - highly sensitive, moderately sensitive, and no availability of D-dimer. We consider the use of clinical prediction rules in guiding the diagnostic process, the potential for negative D-dimer or venous ultrasound (US) to rule out disease, and the role of follow-up testing (US following positive D-dimer result, D-dimer following negative US, and serial US) depending on the probability of DVT at the start of diagnostic process. We recommend the following: that clinicians without access to a highly or moderately sensitive D-dimer test rely on US to guide DVT diagnosis; that those with access use the highly sensitive D-dimer to determine, in patients with low or moderate probability of DVT (by the Wells rule) whether US is needed; that in patients with low pre-test probability (pre-TP) and a negative D-dimer (either highly or moderately sensitive) they follow patients without further testing; that in patients with high pre-test probability they perform a compression ultrasound without D-dimer testing. Copyright by Medycyna Praktyczna, 2009.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)541-549
Number of pages9
JournalPolish Archives of Internal Medicine
Volume119
Issue number9
StatePublished - 2009

Keywords

  • Diagnosis
  • GRADE
  • Practice guidelines
  • Thrombosis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of '2009 Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for diagnosing first episodes of lower extremities deep vein thrombosis in ambulatory outpatients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this